I really don't get this. Microsoft invests millions of dollars in their brand every year - their look and feel. So why is it that they have never, ever completely finished the UI of an OS before they released it? I'm a Windows Lifer in all likelihood (but who knows, I also quite smoking this year), so this isn't an anti-MS rant - I'm just trying to figure out who was asleep at the switch. There is no reason for something this developed, this planned - this invested, to look like such absolute crap.
These icons should have been buried with Windows 3.1, but here they are pointing the way. I also love how they use the same icon to mean two different things on the same page (and if you look real closely, you'll notice that even these two icons are actually different - one is smoothed and the other isn't.)
Is this indicative of the quality under the hood of the OS?
|
||||
WindowsSlop-P
by
Ross
on Thu 27 Nov 2003 09:55 PM EST | Permanent Link
Posted to: Photographs/Moblog
Trackbacks
TrackBack URL: |
Blogroll 2.0
Make a Donation to the Tour For Kids!
Search
![]() "Random Bytes" is a produced for and by Ross Rader. Everything else is just a happy byproduct. The views expressed here belong to me and not my employer.. Contact Me
Feel free to use my contact information to get in touch for work related items. email: ross@tucows.com tel. +1.4165385492 cel. +1.4168288783 MSN. ross@tucows.com Recent Articles
Recent Comments
Recent Visitors
jamessmithforum - Tue 15 Dec 2009 03:21 AM EST
ahmed100 - Tue 08 Dec 2009 06:49 AM EST
Andrew C - Fri 04 Dec 2009 09:57 PM EST
maxvoice - Mon 30 Nov 2009 06:33 AM EST
ahmed1212 - Thu 19 Nov 2009 09:20 PM EST
Login
|
|||
|
||||



